About

Football fan, language geek, love Finland.
I'm Serpent in most places, my Pottermore username is RuneLight4562 (Ravenclaw).
I get overwhelmed if there's too much on my dashboard so I follow quite few accounts and tags, and read some others without making the commitment of following them.
Please don't be offended if I don't follow back, even if we know each other.
Recent tracks:

serpent849's Profile Page

serpent849's LATEST TWEETS

People I Follow

  • The one and only me
  • Harry Potter House Quotes
  • harry potter confessions.
  • Pottermore Sorting: Sorting Hat Analysis and Meta
  • Reasons My Son Is Crying
  • All things Europe
  • Lunette Menstrual Cup
  • #dajeNeto
  • The INFPC - INFP Connection
  • Roman Pavlyuchenko
  • F Yeah, Niko Kranjčar!
  • Eviscerator
  • Follow your dreams
  • This Is My Life
  • Pottermore Confessions
  • We go forward; we go back
  • Linn Warme
  • TO DARE IS TO DO
  • A place for my muse.
  • Football Photo Fiction
  • Fuck Yeah David Luiz!
  • E Pluribus Unum
  • El Matador
  • Tottenham Hotspur Problems
  • Football Hogwarts.
  • My travel photos
  • Fetish Problems
  • Alejandro Martinuccio
  • Fun and eco-friendly periods!
6 ore fa | 22 note

yassine-bale:

Real Madrid’s Bench During The Pitch Invaders | 29.7.2014

Via Yassine Bale
6 ore fa | 3 note

Not Everyone Is Beautiful

Via Lunette Menstrual Cup
1 giorno fa | 121.001 note
eccecorinna:

hemipelagicdredger:

mermaidskey:

mermaidskey:

oxidoreductase:

Lavoisier is having none of your shit.

Heeeey so fun fact: the woman in that painting is Lavoisier’s wife, Marie-Anne Pierrette Paulze, who not only acted as Lavoisier’s lab assistant but also translated English and Latin texts into French so he could read them. But she didn’t just translate, she pointed out errors in the chemistry in some of the texts. Her observations of these errors convinced Lavoisier to study combustion, which led to his discovery of oxygen. She was also critical to the publication of Lavoisier’s Elementary Treatise on Chemistry in 1789. She kept strict records of every experiment they conducted together and drew detailed diagrams of all their equipment. She also threw amazing parties and invited all the brightest minds in science so her husband could pick their brains. After Lavoisier was guillotined she secured all of his notebooks and equipment for posterity.
In short: NOBODY KICKS MADAME LAVOISIER OUT OF THE LAB.

Also, a side note: My historian husband-to-be pointed some things out to me about this painting. Notice that Madame Lavoisier is looking at the viewer, and all the light is on her, while Lavoisier himself is physically smaller than her, in shadow, and looking up to her in reverence. This isn’t a candid photograph- all of these choices are deliberate. The painting isn’t of Lavoisier- Madame Lavoisier is meant to be the central subject. 
I can just imagine Lavoisier telling all his colleagues that his wife is really the one with all the clever ideas, and them patting him on the back and telling him he’s sweet for saying so.

more like


Rebloggin’ for the fantastic commentary and the edit :)

eccecorinna:

hemipelagicdredger:

mermaidskey:

mermaidskey:

oxidoreductase:

Lavoisier is having none of your shit.

Heeeey so fun fact: the woman in that painting is Lavoisier’s wife, Marie-Anne Pierrette Paulze, who not only acted as Lavoisier’s lab assistant but also translated English and Latin texts into French so he could read them. But she didn’t just translate, she pointed out errors in the chemistry in some of the texts. Her observations of these errors convinced Lavoisier to study combustion, which led to his discovery of oxygen. She was also critical to the publication of Lavoisier’s Elementary Treatise on Chemistry in 1789. She kept strict records of every experiment they conducted together and drew detailed diagrams of all their equipment. She also threw amazing parties and invited all the brightest minds in science so her husband could pick their brains. After Lavoisier was guillotined she secured all of his notebooks and equipment for posterity.

In short: NOBODY KICKS MADAME LAVOISIER OUT OF THE LAB.

Also, a side note: My historian husband-to-be pointed some things out to me about this painting. Notice that Madame Lavoisier is looking at the viewer, and all the light is on her, while Lavoisier himself is physically smaller than her, in shadow, and looking up to her in reverence. This isn’t a candid photograph- all of these choices are deliberate. The painting isn’t of Lavoisier- Madame Lavoisier is meant to be the central subject. 

I can just imagine Lavoisier telling all his colleagues that his wife is really the one with all the clever ideas, and them patting him on the back and telling him he’s sweet for saying so.

more like

image

Rebloggin’ for the fantastic commentary and the edit :)

Via Random Bits and Pieces of Nothing
2 giorni fa
awww

awww

2 giorni fa | 1.282 note
allthingseurope:

Saint Petersburg, Russia 

allthingseurope:

Saint Petersburg, Russia 

(Fonte: vaganov-photo)

Via All things Europe
2 giorni fa | 5 note
  • Question: Hello again lol still love your blog. Anyway I was wondering, I find it really difficult to read Contemporary (especially YA) because I find it hard see the book as fiction. Is this part of the infp typing? - xylotopages01
  • Answer:

    infpconnection:

    Hi,

    I’m kind of confused by your wording, are you asking if we have trouble distinguishing the book’s imaginary lands and people as fictional because of our own very dominant imagination? If so, I personally have only that trouble with my own creations, characters and stories. I have heard of INFPs who can’t go out in public days after they finish a book because they are still in that world in their head and have to let it go very slowly and painfully.

    I have befriended some INFPs (and other types with huge imaginations) can’t read much at all, it’s too overwhelming for them.

    I could totally see how an INFP who is really into the fictional world and such could feel that way though, I think any type or person with a deep imagination (ISFPs are known to do this too) can find themselves questioning the barrier of reality and fantasy while reading and making their own worlds.

    I don’t think that it’s a staple of our “type” to not be able to distinguish reality from fiction but I do think it is possible to have that issue and may be more common in the INFP typing than we realize!

    I hope that answered your question? if not just send another cause I may have misunderstood!
    and as always it’s just my opinion! :)-Suzannah

    it’s not that we’re not “able” to distinguish reality and fiction… we just don’t always like it :P

2 giorni fa
lol i admit i laughed and shared this

lol i admit i laughed and shared this

4 giorni fa
cute jump :D

cute jump :D

4 giorni fa
awww luka’s hair is growing :D looks like mini-roma from behind

awww luka’s hair is growing :D looks like mini-roma from behind

5 giorni fa
hm true

hm true